Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Saturday, June 14
    • Lifestyle
    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn VKontakte
    Life Collective
    • Home
    • Lifestyle
    • Leisure

      Dying Girl with Cancer Had One Final Wish—Caitlin Clark’s Unbelievable Response Left Her Family in Tears!

      20/05/2025

      Despite forgetting my name, my husband still waits for me at sunset.

      07/05/2025

      I ended up with a truck full of puppies after stopping for gas in the middle of nowhere.

      07/05/2025

      THE PUPPY WAS SUPPOSED TO HELP HIM HEAL—BUT THEN SOMETHING WENT WRONG

      07/05/2025

      The wife had been silent for a year, hosting her husband’s relatives in their home, until one evening, she finally put the bold family members in their place.

      06/05/2025
    • Privacy Policy
    Life Collective
    Home » Judge blocks Trump administration from freezing federal funding without congressional approval
    Entertainment

    Judge blocks Trump administration from freezing federal funding without congressional approval

    ngankimBy ngankim07/03/20253 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The injunction serves to finalize a decision the judge had previously made in January.

    On Thursday, a federal judge issued a nationwide order preventing the Trump administration from halting federal funding without congressional approval. In his ruling, he strongly criticized what he described as an attempt by the White House to interfere with the balance of power between government branches.

    U.S. District Judge John McConnell had initially placed a temporary block on the funding freeze in January. The latest injunction solidifies that ruling and grants the Trump administration the opportunity to appeal—though their previous attempt to do so was unsuccessful.

    This order explicitly forbids the administration from “reissuing, adopting, implementing, enforcing, or reinstating under a different name” a directive from the Office of Management and Budget, which had briefly suspended billions of dollars in funds.

    “The Executive’s blanket suspension of allocated and obligated funds directly undermines the clearly defined constitutional responsibilities of each branch of government,” McConnell wrote in his decision. “The relationship among the three co-equal branches is intricate, delicate, and carefully structured—yet it is essential to the foundation of our constitutional system. In this case, the Executive branch positioned itself above Congress.”

    Judge McConnell clarified that his ruling does not seek to restrict executive authority or micromanage how federal funds are administered. Instead, he emphasized the constitutional limitations of presidential power.

    “In line with the Constitution, statutory law, and judicial precedent, this Court is simply reaffirming that the Executive branch can only exercise its discretion over appropriated funds when explicitly permitted by congressional legislation,” he stated.

    To support his argument, the judge provided historical context, explaining why the funding freeze was unlawful.

    “We begin by revisiting fundamental lessons in American civics that many of us learned in our early education,” he wrote. “Our nation’s founders, having endured years of hardship under the rule of a distant monarchy, deeply understood the necessity of a more balanced system of governance.”

    He further elaborated: “The principles of ‘checks and balances’ and ‘separation of powers’ have long served as the foundation of our government. These values ensure fairness, cooperation, and representation—enabling a diverse society to function effectively under a unified system.”

    In response to allegations from a coalition of 22 state attorneys general that the Trump administration unlawfully withheld millions in FEMA funding, Judge McConnell instructed the administration to submit a report to the court outlining their adherence—or failure to comply—with the court’s prior injunction.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleDemocrats Break into Song in Response to House Censure of Al Green
    Next Article 3 con giáp trúng số độc đắc đúng 300 tỷ vào ngày 7/3/2025, túi tiền ‘rủng ra rủng rỉnh’, phúc lộc đầy nhà, sớm sắm vàng, sắm bạc

    Related Posts

    Rushing to his wedding, he bought flowers from a little girl by the roadside… But before reaching the registry office, he found a note inside — and called everything off!

    12/06/2025

    – Uncle, it’s Mom’s birthday today… I want to buy flowers, but I don’t have enough money… I bought a bouquet for the boy. And after a while, when I came to the grave, I saw this bouquet there

    12/06/2025

    My New Husband Asked Me to Give My Salary to His Mom — So She Can “Teach Me How to Spend It”

    12/06/2025
    About
    About

    Your source for the lifestyle news. This demo is crafted specifically to exhibit the use of the theme as a lifestyle site. Visit our main page for more demos.

    We're social, connect with us:

    Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest LinkedIn VKontakte
    Copyright © 2017. Designed by ThemeSphere.
    • Home
    • Lifestyle
    • Celebrities

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.