Close Menu
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Thursday, September 11
    • Lifestyle
    Facebook X (Twitter) LinkedIn VKontakte
    Life Collective
    • Home
    • Lifestyle
    • Leisure

      My husband insulted me in front of his mother and sister — and they clapped. I walked away quietly. Five minutes later, one phone call changed everything, and the living room fell silent.

      27/08/2025

      My son uninvited me from the $21,000 Hawaiian vacation I paid for. He texted, “My wife prefers family only. You’ve already done your part by paying.” So I froze every account. They arrived with nothing. But the most sh0cking part wasn’t their panic. It was what I did with the $21,000 refund instead. When he saw my social media post from the same resort, he completely lost it…

      27/08/2025

      They laughed and whispered when I walked into my ex-husband’s funeral. His new wife sneered. My own daughters ignored me. But when the lawyer read the will and said, “To Leona Markham, my only true partner…” the entire church went de:ad silent.

      26/08/2025

      At my sister’s wedding, I noticed a small note under my napkin. It said: “if your husband steps out alone, don’t follow—just watch.” I thought it was a prank, but when I peeked outside, I nearly collapsed.

      25/08/2025

      At my granddaughter’s wedding, my name card described me as “the person covering the costs.” Everyone laughed—until I stood up and revealed a secret line from my late husband’s will. She didn’t know a thing about it.

      25/08/2025
    • Privacy Policy
    Life Collective
    Home » MAJOR LEGAL UPDATE ON TRUMP’S GENDER POLICY EXECUTIVE ORDER
    Lifestyle

    MAJOR LEGAL UPDATE ON TRUMP’S GENDER POLICY EXECUTIVE ORDER

    ngankimBy ngankim21/04/20252 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    A federal judge has blocked a controversial executive order signed by former President Donald Trump that sought to recognize only two genders—male and female—under U.S. federal law and suspend the issuance of non-binary ‘X’ gender markers on passports.

    The order, titled “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” was part of a broader set of policies rolled out by Trump following his return to the White House. The directive aimed to eliminate legal recognition of transgender and non-binary identities in federal documents and programs.

    Under the Biden administration, the State Department began allowing individuals to select an ‘X’ gender marker on passports in October 2021, a move widely praised by LGBTQ+ advocates. Trump’s order reversed this policy, requiring applicants to use only biological sex markers.

    However, U.S. District Judge Julia Kobick ruled that the order and the accompanying passport policy are likely unconstitutional. In her decision, Kobick stated:

    “The Executive Order and the Passport Policy on their face classify passport applicants on the basis of sex and thus must be reviewed under intermediate judicial scrutiny… The government has failed to meet this standard.”

    Major update after Trump was set to ban these specific passports in the US

    She further noted that the plaintiffs—five transgender and two non-binary individuals—had demonstrated that the policy was driven by “irrational prejudice toward transgender Americans” and infringed upon the constitutional guarantee of equal protection.

    The lawsuit was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which argued that the policy would prevent transgender and non-binary Americans from obtaining accurate identification, exposing them to increased risk of discrimination and violence.

    Sruti Swaminathan, a staff attorney with the ACLU, commented:

    “We all have a right to accurate identity documents, and this policy invites harassment, discrimination, and violence against transgender Americans who can no longer obtain or renew a passport that matches who they are.”

    In response, the Trump administration defended the policy, stating that it does not violate the Constitution and asserting that affected individuals can still obtain passports using their biological sex.

    For now, the judge’s ruling halts the enforcement of the executive order and preserves access to non-binary passport options—at least temporarily—as legal proceedings continue.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleThe father of a teenager who was stabbed while at a track meet has spoken out after being escorted from a press conference held by his son’s alleged ki11er’s family.
    Next Article She left her children in the fir forest for a life of wealth—but the past found her 18 years later

    Related Posts

    My husband insulted me in front of his mother and sister — and they clapped. I walked away quietly. Five minutes later, one phone call changed everything, and the living room fell silent.

    27/08/2025

    My son uninvited me from the $21,000 Hawaiian vacation I paid for. He texted, “My wife prefers family only. You’ve already done your part by paying.” So I froze every account. They arrived with nothing. But the most sh0cking part wasn’t their panic. It was what I did with the $21,000 refund instead. When he saw my social media post from the same resort, he completely lost it…

    27/08/2025

    They laughed and whispered when I walked into my ex-husband’s funeral. His new wife sneered. My own daughters ignored me. But when the lawyer read the will and said, “To Leona Markham, my only true partner…” the entire church went de:ad silent.

    26/08/2025
    About
    About

    Your source for the lifestyle news.

    Copyright © 2017. Designed by ThemeSphere.
    • Home
    • Lifestyle
    • Celebrities

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.